Fictional sample: 45 days of top-10 results for “home battery backup systems”, with a new entrant, an exit and one turbulent day, so replay and analysis can be tried before real data is published.
45
snapshots
2026-07-01
first observed
2026-08-14
last observed
DEMOFictional sample data. Every site is invented on the reserved .example domain and every video and channel is made up, so the replay and analysis can be tried before real observations are published. It is replaced automatically once real data is published.
DEMO · FICTIONAL
Historical SERP replay
Loading the verified snapshot index…
Rank
Result
Previous
Movement
Derived from the record
Derived analysis
Everything below is computed from the snapshots above. It interprets the record; it is not an observation, and it says nothing about why a system ranked things as it did.
DERIVED Computed from 45 verified snapshots of “home battery backup systems” · US · desktop. Formulas
5.5
mean volatility
2026-07-25 (26.3)
most volatile day
13
distinct results
10
distinct domains
Volatility per observation
How much the ranking changed since the previous snapshot: 0 means identical, 100 means nothing in common. It is (1 − rank-biased overlap) × 100, which weights the top positions most.
Show the numbers
Observed
Volatility
Entered
Exited
Moved
Mean movement
2026-07-02
0
0
0
0
0
2026-07-03
0.8
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-04
10.8
0
0
4
0.4
2026-07-05
10
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-06
0
0
0
0
0
2026-07-07
0
0
0
0
0
2026-07-08
0.8
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-09
0.8
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-10
1.3
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-11
11.8
0
0
6
0.6
2026-07-12
11
0
0
4
0.4
2026-07-13
3.2
0
0
4
0.4
2026-07-14
0.5
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-15
11.5
0
0
6
0.6
2026-07-16
0.5
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-17
1.2
0
0
4
0.4
2026-07-18
0.8
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-19
0.5
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-20
0.5
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-21
5.7
0
0
6
0.6
2026-07-22
0.8
0
0
2
0.2
2026-07-23
1.7
0
0
2
0.4
2026-07-24
3.1
0
0
3
0.6
2026-07-25
26.3
2
2
7
2.5
2026-07-26
22.7
2
2
6
2
2026-07-27
2.1
0
0
4
0.4
2026-07-28
2.8
0
0
5
0.6
2026-07-29
3.1
0
0
4
0.6
2026-07-30
6.7
1
1
4
0.44
2026-07-31
1.4
0
0
3
0.4
2026-08-01
4.2
0
0
5
1.2
2026-08-02
1.2
0
0
4
0.4
2026-08-03
3.5
0
0
5
0.8
2026-08-04
1.1
0
0
3
0.4
2026-08-05
3.7
0
0
5
0.6
2026-08-06
11.9
0
0
6
0.6
2026-08-07
3.3
0
0
4
0.4
2026-08-08
11.6
0
0
6
0.6
2026-08-09
2.9
0
0
5
0.6
2026-08-10
11.9
0
0
6
0.6
2026-08-11
10.5
0
0
4
0.4
2026-08-12
10.6
0
0
4
0.4
2026-08-13
5.6
0
0
5
0.6
2026-08-14
16.4
0
0
7
0.8
Rank trajectories of the most visible results
Position over time for the 6 results with the most visibility (steady top positions count most). A gap means the result was not in the results that day; no rank is invented for it.
The share of the top-ten positions each domain held in each snapshot. The six domains with the most positions over the whole period are named; everything else is “other”.
voltwise.example
powerpantry.example
brightnook.example
cellforge.example
forum.offgridders.example
gridhaven.example
other
Show the numbers
Domain
Share of top-ten positions
voltwise.example
29.8%
powerpantry.example
10.2%
brightnook.example
10.0%
cellforge.example
10.0%
forum.offgridders.example
10.0%
gridhaven.example
10.0%
amperlane.example
9.8%
fastvolt.example
6.4%
newcell.example
3.6%
solarsense.example
0.2%
Tenure in the top ten
How long each result has held a top-ten position, and whether it still does.
Each result and video below was labelled with the entities it is about, its content type and the intent it serves. These labels are an interpretation, not an observation: they were proposed by deterministic rules (no model), and a person reviewed 0% of them. Entities are kept only when their name appears in the item itself.
RULE-LABELLED 13 items · instructions items-1.0 · labels published 2026-08-14. How labelling works
Share of voice by entity
The share of the top-ten positions held by results or videos about each entity, as labelled. An item about two entities counts for both, so the lines need not add up to 100%.
Voltwise
Cellforge
Gridhaven
Amperlane
Fastvolt
Newcell
Show the numbers
Entity
Share of top-ten positions
Voltwise
30%
Cellforge
10%
Gridhaven
10%
Amperlane
10%
Fastvolt
6%
Newcell
4%
Content mix of the top ten
What kind of page or video held the top-ten positions: reviews, lists, news, vendor pages, forums, tutorials and so on, as labelled.
review
tutorial
vendor
forum
other
news
Show the numbers
Content type
Share of top-ten positions
review
30%
tutorial
30%
vendor
20%
forum
10%
other
7%
news
4%
Searcher intent served
The intent each top-ten result serves (informational, commercial, transactional or navigational), as labelled.
informational
commercial
navigational
transactional
Show the numbers
Intent
Share of top-ten positions
informational
43%
commercial
40%
navigational
10%
transactional
7%
What changed, week by week
Written from computed facts only, never from the raw results; every number in the text appears in a fact it cites. In this demo they are written by rules and published automatically; real narratives are published only after a person approves them.
· drafted by deterministic rules (no model) · published by the demo build
gridhaven.example held the top position all week
Mean daily volatility was 5.8 out of 100. gridhaven.example held the top position all week.
The 2 facts it cites
f2 Mean daily volatility was 5.8 out of 100.
f4 gridhaven.example held the top position all week.
· drafted by deterministic rules (no model) · published by the demo build
gridhaven.example held the top position all week
Mean daily volatility was 3.2 out of 100. gridhaven.example held the top position all week. newcell.example entered the top 10, at rank 8. fastvolt.example left the top 10; it had been at rank 6.
The 4 facts it cites
f2 Mean daily volatility was 3.2 out of 100.
f4 gridhaven.example held the top position all week.
f5 newcell.example entered the top 10, at rank 8.
f6 fastvolt.example left the top 10; it had been at rank 6.
· drafted by deterministic rules (no model) · published by the demo build
gridhaven.example held the top position all week
Mean daily volatility was 10.0 out of 100. gridhaven.example held the top position all week.
The 2 facts it cites
f2 Mean daily volatility was 10.0 out of 100.
f4 gridhaven.example held the top position all week.
· drafted by deterministic rules (no model) · published by the demo build
The top result changed from voltwise.example to gridhaven.example
Mean daily volatility was 2.5 out of 100. The top result changed from voltwise.example to gridhaven.example.
The 2 facts it cites
f2 Mean daily volatility was 2.5 out of 100.
f4 The top result changed from voltwise.example to gridhaven.example.
· drafted by deterministic rules (no model) · published by the demo build
voltwise.example held the top position all week
Mean daily volatility was 4.3 out of 100. voltwise.example held the top position all week.
The 2 facts it cites
f2 Mean daily volatility was 4.3 out of 100.
f4 voltwise.example held the top position all week.
· drafted by deterministic rules (no model) · published by the demo build
voltwise.example held the top position all week
Mean daily volatility was 5.4 out of 100. voltwise.example held the top position all week.
The 2 facts it cites
f2 Mean daily volatility was 5.4 out of 100.
f4 voltwise.example held the top position all week.
What this page represents
The replay reproduces timestamped observations: it is not a live search and not a ranking simulation. Select a date to see what was recorded and how it differs from the snapshot before. The analysis is derived from those same files and labelled as such.
Scope and methodology
The series covers US on desktop. Results were collected by demo-generator on a daily cadence. Read methodology 1.0.
The index lists every snapshot file with its SHA-256 checksum, so a copy can be verified independently. The CSV flattens the same observations, one row per result, with nothing derived added.